Joann was fun, likable, beautiful, always happy, said her sister-in-law Cindy Wiard. In addition to the Facebook page, there are Reddit threads on her case. The case rocked Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley and resulted in. Patricia Lynne Rorrer made for a good suspect. That, as well as measurements of the babys head (revealing the infant to be of a more advanced age) very much suggest they were killed some considerable time after what was believed at her trial. of course they all do it to make money only, some of them do it shamelessly, without the slightest attempt to be fair and honest. It might have said no root but could have been wrong. There was a blood-stained fingernail and hair found on the victims body, and even though (in Keith Morrisons Dateline documentary) the Asst. If I rolled my eyes any harder they might fall out. Did Patricia ever take a lie detector test? Dial-a-problem. We lived close to one another. Lie detectors are pseudo science. During Patricias hours-long turn in the witness chair, Michael McIntyre grilled her relentlessly. The real killer is Rorrer! She was born on Jan. 24, 1964, in eastern Pennsylvania and moved back and forth between there and Davidson County, North Carolina. It was Patricias hair no question. In fact it clearly shows how short you are on all the details surrounding this case. Chris and Fatima investigate the case of Patricia Rorrer, who is in prison for brutally murdering her former boyfriend's wife and baby out of spite; her lawyers claim that she was . Those who knew Joann pointed out that she didnt like to drive in reverse and would have never parked that way. Further, an early FBI report said the hairs found in the car had no roots which contain the DNA suggesting an evidence switcheroo. She was born on Jan. 24, 1964, in eastern Pennsylvania and moved back and forth between there and Davidson County, North Carolina. What a lame article. Anyone who thinks this psycho isnt guilty needs to take off their tin hat. Men who murder are conventional, women are sensational, posits the Worldwide Womens Criminal Justice Network. Rorrers defenders remind me of a case in my home town There was a killer who confessed, was caught on video committing the murder and was seen committing the crime by an eye witness. It was just assumed to be crib death. Just as there is no such thing as the perfect murder, there is also no such thing as the perfect murder investigation. She was the one that left Andy! She only spoke on the phone with him a couple of times a year; when she called that last time, she didnt even know if Andys child was a boy or a girl, and the baby was almost 4 months old. Andrew described his existence with Joanne and Alex as a little Camelot., Ex-spouse off list. Phone records confirmed Patricia placed the earlier call from North Carolina, not Pennsylvania. They depict scenes which are pure speculation or exaggeration or present scenes, which in fact were only theories mentioned at her trial. Deal refused. I dont think so. That phone call came in on December 7, 1994. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. She got 12 months of probation for shoplifting at a Walmart in Lexington, North Carolina. Its definitely getting rougher every day, Andrew told the Morning Call. Had he for some reason been murderously angry with, or bitter towards, Mrs K, why kill his baby? At 17, Patricia dropped out of high school and married landscaper Gary Gabard. Let me simplify this for you in religion, one is taught there is a God. She failed miserably to convince me, or anyone else who mattered, of her innocence. They released a poster of Joann and Alex, noting that the baby had almond-shaped blue eyes, weighed 18 pounds, and was circumcised. Nope. Sorry ladiesher hair was in the car and at the scene.she murdered them. Above, we have another whos totally clueless, has little or no knowledge of this case, but is happy to display his/her ignorance with a rant based on limited knowledge learned from biased documentaries who thinks that by using offensive and insulting language itll influence those who support Rorrer into changing their opinions. Patricia is a evil monster. One lengthy sentence which goes on and on and concludes with one of my sentences from a previous comment! Book her. She definitely did it. Interesting points thanks for writing in (and, yikes, those poor deer that starve to death). MY STATE OF MIND is based on factual information. So would judge and jury say. The investigation is a bit out of place, but the DNA test can be altered only if its made just from a pen, because otherwise it is not possible, only if they said they did it and didnt actually do it, which would be quite difficult because it would mean complicity between many persons. Perhaps youre not aware, there was a great deal of evidence of which these documentaries made no mention, as well as misdeeds and incidents of corruption perpetrated by the cops. Thats my life.. Did you personally attend the trial? Another thing that stumps me is Joannes supposed good friend who said that Joanne told her she was leaving Andrew. I hope she suffers and goes insane from loneliness. Shes where she belongs in prison for the rest of her life. So, if you feel you have to be critical of me, you should also bear in mind those hate-mongers and perhaps have a word with them too. Very similar. Startling new allegations surround one of Lehigh County's most notorious murder cases. Finally, another irony you fail to appreciate: you claim theres money to be made from the commercials added into their show. None. Another inaccuracy in this is, they state the jury took SIX HOURS to return a verdict, when in fact it took less than TWO HOURS. They tested the hair last night on Reasonable Doubt using updated technology it is definitely Patricias. I live in Pennsylvania, not far from where this happened. And the obvious answer is not as you claim. Too many people testified as to the type of person she was. But to settle for just anyone being the offender offers no justice to the victims and certainly does no merit to those who are woefully lacking in ALL the details of this case, but nevertheless feel the need to vent their spleen on an innocent person. ), The Wrong Man investigators Ira Todd and Joe Kennedy have some theories of their own. A person tried in a court of law and then found guilty is not the be-all and end-all to the case. She failed miserably to convince me, or anyone else who mattered, of her innocence.. Pat will spend the rest of her natural life in prison where people like her belong. Have you read the book? Suzanne Pearson fabricated quotes from Patricia including her claim that Patricia said, Im going to the electric chair upon her arrest because a conviction would boost Pearsons career. A few fries short of a Happy Meal, that one. Why would she say that maybe she wasnt really a good friend, just someone trying to inject herself into a super sensational case. Theyre more than happy to exaggerate and speculate the details of the crime, which serves to attract more viewers who (like you) seem to be happy to believe it all. And this doesnt apply to your opinion learnt from a well-researched book, from documentaries which show and mention a great deal of facts and evidence which was never brought up at her trial. They dont need to make money??? The number of delusional people in this world both shocks and frightens me. Whatever the truth is. Its perfectly understandable that one should feel sorry for the victims of this heinous crime. WOW JUST WOW PEOPLE ARE SO BLIND BY ALL THIS. While most of the documentaries come out as reinforcing her guilt, albeit most of them giving differing accounts of the speculation which was presented at her trial, some going even further by showing scenes that were offered as theories at her trial, as FACT. Strands of the accuseds dyed-blond hair at two crime scenes proved it. And, why is it reasonable to believe lay people accept the jury verdict? Weak wages. I can only suggest you read through my comments again, only more thoroughly. But Patricia had moved from Pennsylvania years ago, and she'd started her own family in North Carolina. (Nope. Its true that women were more idiots than about men, they had the impression that if they caught a fool to take them as wives, they would settle for life, even today we see that but more diluted, still an exaggerated reason for murder. Keep up your delusions. Once, when a gun-wielding farmer and his buddy caught Patricia and Gary riding motorcycles on his field, Patricia walked up and got in their faces and argued, Gary recalled to the Morning Call. Andy did end up moving to Colorado with her and the last time I checked, they were still together. If not, how could Andrew have obtained samples of Patricias hair if they apparently didnt meet up in person after Andrews marriage? Theres a similar air of confusion connected to the Scott Peterson debacle. So you see, MY STATE OF MIND is based on factual information. I think Patricias defenders are implying the hair came from some unknown person. After . And she will have to answer eventually. I hope it was only sloppiness of language choice, I refer to your comment of December 22, 2020 at 1:04 pm in which you state, I quote.Im inclined to think both Rorrer and Routier are guilty.. Or did they? Having read that and your most recent comment above, its clearly obvious youre a person of high educational standing and legal knowledge, which I fully respect. ALL IT THEN BECOMES IS A SOURCE OF INACCURACIES AND SPECULATION, WHICH ONLY SERVES TO BOLSTER THOSE WITH THAT MENTALITY AND PERPETUATE THE LACK OF TRUTH. Pat had a string of bad relationships in her past and was not happy. Theres speculation and theres lies period. So where they alive somewhere, and if so how could of Patricia, who was questioned, with not one mark on her kill them? That documentary points out that, despite the bodies of the two victims supposedly being exposed for several months, their condition remained relatively undisturbed by weather or animal activity. Forensic tests suggested the hair found in the car and at the murder scene came from Patricia. The series was produced by Joe Berlinger, who made the Paradise Lost documentaries, which garnered actor Johnny Depps attention and ultimately helped free the West Memphis Three. The Free Patricia Rorrer page responds to comments from supporters (How is this even possible that this woman is still in jail?!? Perhaps youre not aware, there was a great deal of evidence of which these documentaries made no mention, as well as misdeeds and incidents of corruption perpetrated by the cops. What the prosecution failed to disclose to Rorrers defence team was that the cops, in their zeal to prove their gun theory, visited several addresses of which Rorrer was resident, dug up the gardens in which she was known to do target practice recovered several shell casings and bullets (more than 70), had them ballistically tested, but NOT ONE was found to be a match to the bullet recovered from the victim. But investigators conceded they had no solid evidence against Andrew. And NOBODY saw her at all? You people are fighting a losing cause! Jealousy was the motive. Pat is locked in a cage because shes an animal. I noticed quite a few errors myself. How do you explain her not telling the truth to the authorities about the gun and its flaw of only able to shoot once and then jamming up. They did this case on Reasonable Doubt last night. As to her duration on death row, no: inference cannot be made as to her guilt as theres a woman with about the same time (Holberg) and another with almost as much. Joanne didnt go missing until December 15, an entire week and a day later. If you want to help her tell her to ask God for forgiveness. After Joann Katrinak, the wife of Patricias former flame, turned up dead along with her infant son, prosecutors suspected Patricia. They were people that knew her, not Andrew. If Patricia drove it back from the murder scene after she shot Joann and then beat her to death, luminal would have lit up the interior. Catherine are you sure your names not Karen? The phone wire was located at the opposite end of the basement, which was dark. At one point Interpol had an extremely similar case in which an individual convinced a friend, who had been his sexual partner several times in the past, to kill the woman he had a baby with, on the grounds that the child is not his and he does not love her but cannot leave because everyone would accuse him of abandoning his child and his family name would be affected. so then using your contention, one who is deeply religious and sees God as being a factual figure is wrong? Ive followed and made a study of this case for more than twenty years and have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. She wanted all men to give her attention but she couldnt have everyones attention, especially ANDREWS!!! Its not logical to say we know the truth unless we seen it for ourselves. And even prosecutor Michael McIntyre, who wrote the book Hair Trigger about the case, acknowledged to Keith Morrison that it was a little odd that the police found blood on the hairs in Joanns car but nowhere else in the vehicle. And the fact that Patricia called Andrew even after he married someone else didnt mean she was still carrying a torch for him, according to one of her friends. Your assertion that most people cant distinguish reality from crackpot nonsense is in fact nonsense the reality is that most people are easily fooled by these biased documentaries who then feel its okay to spout their tripe as if its the gospel. Check out ALL the facts if you feel the need to comment. Go watch the Reasonable Doubt episode from last night Patricia did it. On January 11, 2021, The state police dropped him as a suspect. Its never been made clear. Very soon after, the original hairs (in glass slides) were sent to the FBI again. Puny policy. Now retired, he declined ForensicFilesNow.coms invitation to spar directly with Patricia via a podcast. Hoist by your own petard. Just one example. If you look at the crime scene picture, only parts of the mother seem preserved. Your position Ive read a lot, Im right; you disagree with me, Ill say youre a moron. Unless theres a complicity between him and her, and the reason she didnt divulge it is because she hopes to put all the blame on him, when she was the one to murder and he was a planner. Not everything is a conspiracy. I deduced my opinion to be fact because of what Ive read and seen and is supported by evidence which was never disclosed at her trial. Most of all, Patricia said, she would like a rematch with prosecutor Michael McIntyre. Joann Katrinaks Killer Still Has Innocence Advocates(A Woman Scorned, Forensic Files). Anyway, there are thousands of people who differ from that belief, that is why there is so much controversy surrounding this case, and that is why there have been numerous convicted people in the past whove been exonerated on appeal. Cops under pressure will lie to close a case. Episode Info. Pfeiffer and Burke claimed that police Sgt. I can't believe this bitch has a whole internet community rallying for her; have they SEEN the evidence? Why would it be an irony for a person to express his opinion? At 10:30 p.m., Andrew reported his wife missing. Combination locks. Testimony from Walter Blalock contradicted Patricias claim that she never had a gun. And for you to even ask why documentaries are biased, makes me wonder if you have the ability to determine fact from fiction! Does it actually have to be an obligatory duty for anyone to be present at a trial before they are able to have an opinion? (even though hes married and has a baby) Who does that?!! This Sunday, Investigation Discovery and velvety-voiced Dateline NBC correspondent Keith Morrison will revisit the double-homicide. They also think she killed her first hubby Larry Ford as well. She never had anyone testify against her but an ex-boyfriend! Prosecutors offered Patricia a plea deal that would take the death penalty off the table, but she declined. Wouldnt that verify Troutmans claim that the husband was arguing with the victim, in a rage? DA readily agreed they did not belong to Rorrer, was happy to admit they were never submitted for analysis.
Sauders Sheds Waterloo Ny,
Leslie Stephens Wedding,
Dicier To Brits Crossword Clue,
How Much Are British Shorthair Kittens,
Are Randy And Kina From The Challenge Still Together,
Articles P